From a developer’s point of view, can you explain how building on Moonbeam compares with creating their own Parachain or Parathread ?
Katie Butler (Head of Marketing) -
Sure well just for the first point here we've been working on Moonbeam for two and a half years. That's how long it took us to launch a Parachain and part of that is because Parachains weren't live yet. So I can't claim that was all kind of you know like you could probably compress that time quite a bit and substrate this framework I mentioned. It does allow you to deploy pretty quickly but inherently the issues mostly for Dapps if you look at kind of the dapps scenario let's say you have only dapps live on an Ethereum style chain, you probably have it already written in solidity and you probably already have some token live or some number of tokens live. So when you look to Polkadot if you have to build your own Parachain, first you have to go hire a team that knows Rust & I can tell you this is really difficult all the folks in the Polkadot ecosystem are competing with each other for Rust developers. It's really difficult to find talent in order to build these Parachains, even when you do find those Rust developers you're going to have to take all the code that you already have and rewrite it for this Rust style environment if you want to build your own Parachain and because now its it’s own layer one right, don't forget that Parachains are all their own layer one so you have to consider how do you want to approach governance, what are the mechanisms you want to build, and how are you going to produce blocks. So I mentioned we had these collators, so you got to build your own collator program and recruit them and come up with a compensation model and then of course like what are you going to do for your tokenomics, how are you going to distribute that, how are you going to go to market how are you going to bootstrap the cost of a Parachain if you want a Parachain, Parathreads are a little different where you could kind of do this Pay-as-you-go model. So it kind of reduces the bootstrapping piece. But I think you know the real barriers between all those things are like hiring, rewriting and then there's just a lot of business oriented things that come with deploying a Parachain and so what I really like about the idea of coming at least first to a Parachain whether it be Moonbeam or another Parachain is you can get into the ecosystem, prove whether there's traction or not, as there's a lot of newness around Polkadot where only I think Moonbeam was the first Parachain to launch in January. So it's a maximum of 10 weeks for Parachains here to be live and kind producing things. So it's just so new and it's difficult for all teams to know whether this is a place they can be successful and of course we think that's a resounding yes but I think that that's a lesson they need to learn for themselves. So what Moonbeam really does is like , Hey deploy here first it's really fast we continuously hear from people building on top of Moonbeam that it's the easiest experience among any EVM chain which of course we love to hear and down the road if they want to kind of transition into their own Parachain they have that runway, they have that time and they can kind of make a more gradual experience there if they want. So we like to talk about it as an On-Ramp like come in, try it out, the water's fine and then if you guys want to build your own layer one either in parallel or eventually transition into one, that doorway is open and we're happy to help you guys do that.